Mary Creagh

Working hard for Wakefield

Home - Mary Creagh MP

Recent Activity

First, some good news! After 8 months of uncertainty for students, staff and parents, CAPA College will be staying in Wakefield and re-opening its doors to new students in September 2018. A botched attempt to move the college to Leeds left the future of this outstanding performing arts college hanging in the balance. I have been calling on Ministers in Parliament and working with the Schools Commissioner for Yorkshire, parents, teachers and governors to get CAPA College a new permanent home in Wakefield. I hope we will soon have some more good news to celebrate.

I was delighted to open the fantastic new £7 million Advanced Innovation and Skills Centre at Wakefield College.  Wakefield is one of the largest cities in the UK without a university. People don’t want to have to travel to Leeds or Huddersfield to study university-level courses. The new Centre will transform higher-level skills training in Wakefield, allowing people to study for degrees without having to move away from our city. I pay tribute to Wakefield College’s principal Sam Wright and her team. This is a landmark building for the city, and will bring more students, graduates, businesses and jobs to Wakefield

In Parliament the Environmental Audit Committee, which I chair, gave coffee companies a roasting last week over their failure to recycle disposable cups. The UK uses 2.5 billion disposable coffee cups every year, but fewer than 1% are recycled. Disposable cups are coated with a thin plastic film to make them watertight, but makes them almost impossible to recycle. Coffee companies have been printing labelling on the cups, misleading coffee drinkers into thinking that the cups are recyclable. It is time they started to take responsibility for the waste problem they have created. Costa Coffee will recycle any cup and give you 25p off your hot drink if you bring your own mug. Why not give it a try?

We are also looking at single use plastic bottles. We use 35m bottles a day, only half of which are recycled. Plastic litters our towns and cities, collects in rivers and ends up in the sea. We need to reduce our waste, reuse what we can, and recycle. One solution might be to reintroduce a deposit return. Long before recycling became fashionable Britain had common sense systems such as these for reusing our empties.

The chaotic infighting on Brexit is consuming the Tory Party. While the Tories squabble, the clock is ticking, and the risk of crashing out of the EU with no deal grows. For families and businesses in Wakefield, leaving the EU with no deal would be a nightmare. There would be no free trade agreement between the UK and our biggest trading partner – the EU buys nearly half of everything we sell. We already have the lowest growth and highest inflation of any EU country.

Leaving with no deal would hammer the UK’s chemicals industry, which is our second largest export to the EU after cars. EU regulations protect human health and the environment, and enable chemical companies in Wakefield to sell products across Europe. With the terrible news of 400 Brexit-related job losses at BAE’s plant in Brough, and 400 job losses at Vauxhall’s plant at Ellesmere Port, the Government needs to give certainty to companies employing tens of thousands of British workers. If they don’t I fear this trickle of bad Brexit news could become a flood in the New Year.

Wakefield Express Column October 2017

First, some good news! After 8 months of uncertainty for students, staff and parents, CAPA College will be staying in Wakefield and re-opening its doors to new students in September...

Parents and students returning to school this month should be settling into a new term and a new academic year. But with the news that Wakefield City Academies Trust is pulling out of running its 21 schools across Yorkshire, many students and teachers face huge uncertainty. This has come as a bolt from the blue.

In Parliament, I asked the Education Secretary Justine Greening what action the Government was taking, and what reassurance she could provide the parents, students and teachers who are worried about the future of their local schools. She had no answer, and resorted to political point scoring to avoid answering my question. This is yet another stark example of failure in the Government’s management of its academies programme, and comes hard on the heels of the chaotic handling of CAPA College. I am hopeful that a new home in Wakefield can be found soon for this outstanding academy, although this will be cold comfort for the lower sixth students who missed out on a place this year because of uncertainty over its future.

After seven years of falling pay for public sector workers, the Tories attempted to play a political trick in announcing the end of the public sector pay cap for police and prison officers. But the increase is actually a cut, because it fails to keep up with inflation. The money will come from existing budgets, which means there will be further cuts to frontline staff, and could mean losing 80 officers in West Yorkshire. 

Our thoughts and prayers are with everyone affected by the terrorist attack at Parsons Green last week. After a summer marred by attacks in Westminster, Manchester, London Bridge and Finsbury Park, the Government must do everything they can to keep people safe. It is deeply concerning that Ministers are planning a £50m cut to the budget for the Office for Security and Counterterrorism, which is responsible for Britain’s overall terrorism strategy, and which pays for the government’s Prevent programme.

After a summer of infighting and the resignation of key Ministers working on Brexit from the Department of International Trade, Exiting the EU, and the Treasury, Theresa May is now facing a civil war in her party on two fronts. First, she faces a backbench revolt over her Government’s latest Bill, which gives Ministers unprecedented powers to change or scrap key legal rights and protections for consumers, workers and the environment with minimal Parliamentary scrutiny. Parliament must not be side-lined on key decisions as we leave the EU, and I and my Labour colleagues voted against this fatally flawed Bill.

Second, Boris Johnson triggered fresh chaos last weekend by undermining Theresa May and repeating the lie that leaving the EU would magically generate £350m a week. The head of the UK Statistics Authority Sir David Norgrove condemned this as a “clear misuse of official statistics.” As Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson should be focusing on the UK’s response to hurricane Irma, dealing with North Korea’s reckless missile tests and finding a solution to the appalling ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya muslims in Burma. The world is more unstable now than at any time in the last 30 years. We need a Government united and pulling together for the good of the country, not tearing itself apart over Brexit.

Wakefield Express Column September 2017

Parents and students returning to school this month should be settling into a new term and a new academic year. But with the news that Wakefield City Academies Trust is...

Mary's speech in the debate on the EU Withdrawal Bill:

I will be joining my colleagues in the Lobby tonight to vote against this Bill, because of the unprecedented Henry VIII powers that will transfer power away from Parliament and give it to Ministers. In some ways, these powers will turn the Prime Minister into a female version of Louis XIV, the sun king, who, as he lay on his deathbed in the palace of Versailles, said, “L’état, c’est moi.” That is what she is doing with the Bill, but as representatives of the British people, sent here with a democratic mandate, we say, “L’état, c’est nous.” We are the legislative force in this country; no sun king or sun queen will be created on our watch, and we will not give up our parliamentary democracy without a fight.

It is perfectly possible to recognise and respect the result of the referendum without sacrificing hard-won economic, social and environmental rights and freedoms. As we have heard, at the general election the people declined to give the Prime Minister the majority she sought. Through the general election, the people have already rejected a hard Brexit, so the question before us tonight is: who governs Britain—this Parliament, or a Prime Minister reliant on some hard-liners in her party and on the Democratic Unionist party, which she is paying whatever it demands to get her laws through?

Clause 9 would allow Ministers to introduce regulations to make any provision that can be made by an Act of Parliament, including modifying this legislation, a huge power that will last right up to exit day. It is therefore the great power grab Bill, which will create an infinite legislative loop: the powers can be extended infinitely to amend laws, through delegated legislation, with no scrutiny. The fact that the power to amend this Act lies within it means that the Bill can eat itself; it is like a constantly regenerating loop in some science fiction nightmare, providing new powers ad infinitum at the whim of whichever Government are in place at any given moment.

We have seen this before, because the Government have form. They did not want to give this place a vote on article 50, or on the final deal. They fought at every turn to frustrate this House in overseeing what they are doing, and frustrate us in our duties and responsibilities to our electors. The powers in clause 9 will end on exit day, but the Bill allows exit day to be set by Ministers, so those powers could continue for many years—indeed, there could be several exit days. That is not how we make laws in this country. We also have money and ​Ways and Means motions before us tonight that mean that Ministers can spend any sum or raise any tax as a result of this Bill. As well as being a legislative blank cheque, the Bill is therefore a literal blank cheque for the Government. That is not how we make laws in this country.

All these new laws made by delegated legislation can be amended by delegated legislation. The Government say that there will be opportunities for scrutiny, but they want a majority of one on all Delegated Legislation Committees, so that they can rubber-stamp the delegated legislation, despite failing to win a majority at the general election. That is not how we make laws in this country. The Bill can create new criminal offences under the negative resolution procedure of things such as food adulteration or trading illegal chemicals. New criminal offences will be made with no parliamentary scrutiny. That is not how we make laws in this country.

This Bill should protect our hard-won social, environmental, political and economic rights. In fact, it guarantees nothing of the sort. Even if those rights are somehow replicated in the future, the Bill is silent about remedies, and it is the remedies, not the rights, that are the spur to action. The threat of EU fines led to us taxing waste that goes to landfill, which kick-started the recycling industry in this country. The threat of massive fines for filthy air pollution has led to the Government publishing not one, not two, but three clean air plans. The threat of fines under the water framework directive has led to UK water companies cleaning up our filthy beaches and rivers. Those environmental improvements and industries were created because the threat of financial penalties focused the minds of Ministers and civil servants. If there is no remedy for the citizen, the right that the law confers is toothless.

The Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union said on Second Reading that the Government would introduce proposals. Why are they not in the Bill? How many rights that we currently enjoy are threatened by the Bill? Francovich will not apply to the individual, so future rights will be removed from citizens. The acquis communautaire, which we have adopted, refers to the environment, but a third of it cannot be neatly cut and pasted into UK law.

We will not simply be able to cut and paste chemicals measures. REACH is the big regulation on registering, evaluating and authorising chemicals. It protects the public and the environment from hazardous substances and it is vital to British jobs, growth and investment. Our chemical industry is the second largest exporter to the EU after cars, selling £15 billion of chemical exports to the EU every year. Leaving REACH could cause market freeze and supply chain disruption to the industry. The Environmental Audit Committee heard from techUK and the defence industries how incredibly concerned they were about that. One in five UK chemicals companies represented by the Chemical Business Association are not waiting for regulatory certainty from the Government, ​and are already investigating opportunities to set up shop in other EU countries, harming jobs, investment and growth in this country.

The Bill does not protect the citizen and it does not incorporate either the principle of EU law that the polluter pays or the precautionary principle. For those reasons, for the vast destruction of our environmental and social rights, I shall vote against the Bill.

Speech in EU Withdrawal Bill debate

Mary's speech in the debate on the EU Withdrawal Bill: I will be joining my colleagues in the Lobby tonight to vote against this Bill, because of the unprecedented Henry...

View More Activities

The Labour Party will place cookies on your computer to help us make this website better.

Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site.

To find out more about these cookies, see our privacy notice. Use of this site confirms your acceptance of these cookies.